MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2518304318 · doi:10.1002/2016sw001376

The latitudinal variation of geoelectromagnetic disturbances during large (<i>Dst</i>≤−100 nT) geomagnetic storms

2016· article· en· W2518304318 on OpenAlexfundno aff
J. R. Woodroffe, Steven K. Morley, V. K. Jordanova, M. G. Henderson, Misa Cowee, J. G. Gjerloev

Bibliographic record

VenueSpace Weather · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLos Alamos National LaboratoryU.S. Geological SurveyFlorida Institute of TechnologyLaboratory Directed Research and DevelopmentU.S. Department of EnergyAlberta Agricultural Research InstituteU.S. Department of Homeland Security
KeywordsGeomagnetic stormEarth's magnetic fieldMagnetometerStormAmplitudeSpace weatherLatitudeRange (aeronautics)Variation (astronomy)Geomagnetic latitudeMeteorologyAtmospheric sciencesEnvironmental scienceGeodesyMathematicsPhysicsGeologyMagnetic fieldAstrophysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Geoelectromagnetic disturbances (GMDs) are an important consequence of space weather that can directly impact many types of terrestrial infrastructure. In this paper, we analyze 30 years of SuperMAG magnetometer data from the range of magnetic latitudes 20°≤λ≤75° to derive characteristic latitudinal profiles for median GMD amplitudes. Based on this data, we obtain a parameterization of these latitudinal profiles of different types of GMDs, providing an analytical fit with Dst‐dependent parameters. We also obtain probabilistic estimates for the magnitudes of “100 year” GMDs, finding that = 6.9 (3.60–12.9) nT/s should be expected at 45°≤λ < 50°, exceeding the 5 nT/s threshold for dangerous inductive heating.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpace WeatherSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207