MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2518313945

OXIDATIVE METABOLISM ACTIVITY IN Hydra attenuata EXPOSED TO CARBAMAZEPINE

2004· article· en· W2518313945 on OpenAlexaff
Brian Quinn, François Gagné, C. Blaise

Bibliographic record

VenueFresenius environmental bulletin · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlutathioneBiologyMetabolismCatalaseBiochemistryChemistryPharmacologyOxidative stressEnzyme
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY The cnidarian Hydra attenuata has become an in-creasingly popular bioindicator species owing to its sensi-tivity to various environmental contaminants. In this study, we examined the oxidative metabolism and bio-transformation capacity of Hydra attenuata exposed to the drug carbamazepine (CBZ), commonly found in mu-nicipal wastewaters. The organisms were first exposed to increasing concentrations of CBZ for 48 h at 20 o C. They were then tested for heme oxidase (HO) and lipid peroxi-dation (LPO) in addition to phase I (ethoxy/ benzyloxyre-sorufin, dibenzyloxyfluorescein and 3-cyano-7-ethoxy-coumarin de-alkylase activities) and phase II (glutathione S-transferase and sulfotransferase activities) biotransforma-tion reactions. Results showed that exposure to CBZ led to the induction of HO activity and LPO in Hydra . The activity of benzyloxyresorufin de-alkylase was induced by CBZ, while no significant change in 7-ethoxy-resorufin O-deethylase activity took place. Glutathione S-transferase activity was also induced at low concentrations, but sul-fotransferase activity was elevated only at the highest concentration tested. appears to possess both

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFresenius environmental bulletinSame topicPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsFrench-language works237,207