Self-Assembly of Binary Mesocrystals from Blends of BABCB Multiblock Copolymers and ABC Triblock Copolymers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The phase behavior of binary blends composed of BABCB-type pentablock terpolymers and ABC-type triblock copolymers is investigated using the self-consistent field theory in the grand canonical ensemble. Specifically, the study is focused on how the simpler copolymers regulate the phase behavior of two sphere-forming multiblock copolymers of the type B1AB2CB1 and AB2CB3. For certain compositions, these two multiblock copolymers self-assemble to form mesocrystalline phases composed of binary A and C spheres with the ZnSC and ReO3 structures, respectively. It is discovered that the addition of symmetric ABC triblocks or AB diblocks to the two multiblock copolymers leads to the formation of different binary crystalline phases including symmetric binary crystalline phase of NaCl type for the A/C-component symmetric blends and asymmetric Cu2O, SnI4, TiO2, and CaF2 phases for the A/C-component asymmetric blends. In particular, the binary mesocrystals of the Cu2O and SnI4 structures observed in the blends of the tail-symmetric B1AB2CB1 terpolymers and the AB diblock copolymers are new stable phases which have not been observed in the B1AB2CB3 terpolymers melts. The theoretical results demonstrate that blending of block copolymers with specially designed multiblock terpolymers could provide an efficient route to fabricate binary mesocrystals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".