MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2518395429 · doi:10.3747/co.23.3283

Corrigendum: Eastern Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference 2014

2016· erratum· en· W2518395429 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Elena Tsvetkova, Shelly Sud, Nathalie Aucoin, J. Biagi, Ronald L. Burkes, Benoît Samson, Stephanie Yasmin Brule, C. Cripps, Bruce Colwell, Conrad Falkson, M. Dorreen, Rakesh Goel, F Halwani, Celia Marginean, Jean A. Maroun, Neil R. Michaud, Mustapha Tehfé, Michael P. Thirlwell, Michael M. Vickers, Timothy R. Asmis

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Oncology · 2016
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreUniversité de MontréalDalhousie UniversityMount Sinai HospitalMcGill UniversityCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalHôpital Charles-Le MoyneQueen's UniversityCegep de Sept IlesOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCancerFamily medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It came to our attention that, over the course of putting together this article[...]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.065
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.889
Threshold uncertainty score0.220

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.065
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0090.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0490.033

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.145
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent OncologySame topicGastric Cancer Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207