MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Soluble CD23 (sCD23): A Forgotten Indicator of Prognosis and Identifier of Outcome in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Utilizing a Novel Cba Approach

2014· article· en· W2518479252 on OpenAlexaffabout
Timothy Farren, Fengting Liu, Magali Le Garff‐Tavernier, Marika Sarfati, Frans Nauwelaers, Jim Keenan, Noel L. Warner, Hélène Merle‐Béral, Samir Agrawal

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCD23Immunoglobulin ECD38Chronic lymphocytic leukemiaImmunologyAntibodyMolecular biologyImmunoassayMedicineLeukemiaBiologyGastroenterologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: CD23 is a 45-kDa transmembrane glycoprotein corresponding to the low-affinity receptor for the immunoglobulin E (IgE). There are two isoforms - CD23a expressed on B-cells, and CD23b primarily expressed on monocytes, T-cells and platelets. The CD23 protein can be cleaved and released into the serum as a soluble form of CD23 (sCD23). The sCD23 is a 25kDa fragment that can be found in serum, plasma and urine in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Objective: To evaluate a novel and robust method of sCD23 detection using CBA detection, and correlate with known markers of prognostication and clinical outcome. Methods: At Barts & The London School of Medicine, historical serum samples have been taken at diagnosis from patients with CLL between 1984 to 2012 with corresponding clinical data. Serum analysis was obtained from 60 healthy controls and assessed for sCD23 in ng/ml (France and Canada). sCD23 levels (ng/ml) were evaluated against known prognostic markers and clinical features, including: ZAP-70 (>20%), CD38 (>20%), B2M, cytogenetics (17p-/11q- vs 12+/13q-/normal), LDH, splenomegaly, hepatomegaly, and lymphadenopathy. 107 samples from 86 patients underwent retrospective assessment of sCD23 from stored serum. The sCD23 cytometric bead array (CBA) flow cytometric assay (BD Biosciences) captures the soluble analyte with beads of known size and fluorescence.1 Capture beads are identified and sCD23 quantification (in ng/ml) is performed based on PE fluorescence excitation. Results were acquired using FACSDiva (BD Biosciences) and analysed using FCAParray. Statistical analysis was performed and significance was set at <0.05%. Results: sCD23 levels from the 86 patients ranged from 1.92 to 2441 ng/ml with a median value of 234.5 ng/ml. The sCD23 levels from the healthy control group ranged from 0.43 to 5.16 ng/ml with a median value of 1.56 ng/ml (figure 1). Figure 1: sCD23 levels between healthy controls and patients Figure 1:. sCD23 levels between healthy controls and patients Within the CLL patient cohort, elevated sCD23 significantly correlated with 6 out of the 8 prognostic & clinical indicators (Table 1). Table 1: Median sCD23 (ng/ml) for CLL patients by prognostic risk stratification. Indicator Median sCD23 (ng/ml) Level of significance (MWU-test) ZAP-70 positive (n=19) 1,096.0 P<0.01 ZAP-70 negative (n=38) 116.3 CD38 positive (n=22) 389.5 P=0.06 CD38 negative (n=50) 114.1 Poor risk karyotype (n=44) 580.7 P<0.01 Good risk karyotype (n=38) 135.8 B2M high (n=25) 116.9 P=0.95 B2M normal (n=16) 200.7 LDH high (n=31) 561.7 P=0.03 LDH normal (n=34) 140.6 Lymphadenopathy (n=50) 390.2 P<0.01 No lymphadenopathy (n=25) 40.80 Splenomegaly (n=30) 875.2 P<0.01 No splenomegaly (n=41) 73.60 Hepatomegaly (n=11) 425.8 P=0.04 Hepatomegaly (n=44) 110.2 In addition, there was a strong correlation with response to therapy. Those patients who never required therapy (n=21) had significantly lower levels of sCD23 (mean 93.36ng/ml) over those who achieved a partial remission (n=21, mean 650.2 ng/ml p<0.01), or those with no response to therapy (n=15, mean 1183.0 ng/ml, p<0.01). There was no difference between those with never required therapy and those who achieved a complete remission (n=14, mean 133.5ng/ml, p=0.70) (Figure 2). Figure 2: Mean sCD23 level (ng/ml) at diagnosis against response to therapy when required. Figure 2:. Mean sCD23 level (ng/ml) at diagnosis against response to therapy when required. Two patients had sequential serum samples taken throughout therapy. The patient with elevated sCD23 at diagnosis remained elevated through each treatment cycle to only achieve partial response, whilst the patient with low sCD23 at diagnosis responded well to therapy and achieved a complete remission (p=0.01, Figure 3). Figure 3: sCD23 following therapy. sCD23 non-responder did not respond to FC or FCR therapy . The responder received Chlorambucil+R then FCR. Figure 3:. sCD23 following therapy. sCD23 non-responder did not respond to FC or FCR therapy . The responder received Chlorambucil+R then FCR. Conclusion: We have evaluated in a pilot study the sCD23 CBA assay, which is an easy and reproducible assay. Elevated levels of sCD23 at diagnosis correlated with “physical” prognosis, as well as known biological markers of prognostication. Those patients with elevated levels of sCD23 at diagnosis correlated with response to therapy regardless of therapy given, and there is evidence that patients who do not respond to therapy retain their elevated levels of sCD23 during therapy. This simple assay could provide the basis for individualised risk stratification and prediction of response to therapy based on an individual analyte. Ref: 1 Grelier A et al. Cytometry B. 2014 Mar;86(2):91-7. Disclosures Farren: BD Biosciences: Research Funding. Nauwelaers:BD Biosciences: Employment. Keenan:BD Bioscience: Employment. Warner:BD Biosciences: Employment. Agrawal:BD Biosciences: Research Funding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207