MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2518545741 · doi:10.1109/wcnc.2016.7564657

Resource optimization for energy efficiency in multi-cell massive MIMO with MRC detectors

2016· article· en· W2518545741 on OpenAlexaff
K. N. R. Surya Vara Prasad, Vijay K. Bhargava

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFractional programmingComputer scienceMathematical optimizationMIMOTelecommunications linkTransmitter power outputConvex optimizationOptimization problemBase stationEfficient energy useTransmission (telecommunications)Iterative methodAlgorithmMathematicsNonlinear programmingTelecommunicationsRegular polygonElectrical engineeringEngineeringChannel (broadcasting)Transmitter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, resource allocation for energy-efficient communications in a pilot-contaminated uplink multi-cell massive MIMO system with MRC detectors is investigated. The problem of maximizing energy efficiency (EE) of data transmissions in the system is studied by optimizing the number of antennas per BS, the pilot signal power, and the data signal power. The considered optimization problem takes into account the circuit power consumption, pilot contamination, and budget constraints in the number of antennas per Base Station (BS) and the average transmission power per symbol. The resulting optimization problem has a non-convex fractional objective function which is difficult to solve in its original form. Therefore, principles from fractional programming are used to first transform the problem into an equivalent parametric form and then to derive an iterative resource allocation algorithm. In each iteration, an alternating optimization technique is used to solve the objective function by decomposing it into a sequence of solvable difference of convex (D.C) programming subproblems. Simulation results show that higher EE levels can be achieved by optimizing the pilot and data powers separately. Also, increasing the number of antennas per BS with the power budget may or may not be energy-efficient, depending on the range of operation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score0.401

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207