MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2518546847

Canada-United States Cross-Border Insolvency Relations and the UNCITRAL Model Law

2007· article· en· W2518546847 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jacob S. Ziegel

Bibliographic record

VenueBrooklyn journal of international law · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Governance and Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInsolvencyLawPolitical scienceBusiness
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

See Ziegel, Corporate Groups, supra note 8, at 386-87.29.[2000] 18 C.B.R. (4th) 157, [2000] 5 B.L.R. (3d) 75 (Ont.S.C.J. [Commercial]).30.The order did not arise automatically under section 362 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, but apparently was a separate order made by Judge Brown under section 105 of the Code.Section 105 authorizes U.S. bankruptcy courts to issue such additional orders as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of the Code.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.609

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0210.012
Scholarly communication0.0160.004
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0060.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueBrooklyn journal of international lawSame topicCorporate Governance and LawFrench-language works237,207