MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2518884511 · doi:10.7202/1037347ar

Les croix de chemin du Québec et la naissance du dévotionnalisme contemporain

2016· article· fr· W2518884511 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Hillary Kaell

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes d histoire religieuse · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Tourism and Spaces
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les croix de chemin québécoises ont été décrites comme une tradition attaquée sur deux plans. D’abord, par une église modernisatrice dont l’objectif est de limiter le dévotionnalisme. Ensuite, par les adeptes de la laïcité qui tentent de créer une sphère publique religieusement neutre. Cet article explore les interactions souvent ambivalentes entre la dévotion publique et privée de même qu’entre le catholicisme et la patrimonialisation. Les questions en jeu concernent le rôle des structures préconciliaires dans le paysage bâti du Québec rural, avec le but de montrer que cette forme de dévotionnalisme est conçue par les « propriétaires » de croix de chemin comme une nouvelle façon de vivre la foi catholique au XXI e siècle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.558
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes d histoire religieuseSame topicReligious Tourism and SpacesFrench-language works237,207