MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2518891199 · doi:10.1080/07474946.2016.1206386

Multistage estimation of the difference of locations of two negative exponential populations under a modified Linex loss function: Real data illustrations from cancer studies and reliability analysis

2016· article· en· W2518891199 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSequential Analysis · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsStatisticsExponential functionApplied mathematicsFunction (biology)Taylor seriesSeries (stratigraphy)Exponential distributionMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have designed modified two-stage and purely sequential strategies to estimate the difference of location parameters from two independent negative exponential populations having unknown but proportional scale parameters under a modified Linex loss function. This article extends one-sample methodologies of Mukhopadhyay and Bapat (2016 Mukhopadhyay, N. and Bapat, S. R. (2016). Multistage Point Estimation Methodologies for a Negative Exponential Location under a Modified Linex Loss Function: Illustrations with Infant Mortality and Bone Marrow Data, Sequential Analysis 35: 175–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07474946.2016.1165532.[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], Sequential Analysis). Some preliminary results are established along the lines of Mukhopadhyay and Hamdy (1984 Mukhopadhyay, N. and Hamdy, H. I. (1984). On Estimating the Difference of Location Parameters of Two Negative Exponential Distributions, Canadian Journal of Statistics 12: 67–76.[Crossref] , [Google Scholar], Canadian Journal of Statistics) and Mukhopadhyay and Darmanto (1988 Mukhopadhyay, N. and Darmanto, S. (1988). Sequential Estimation of the Difference of Means of Two Negative Exponential Populations, Sequential Analysis 7: 165–190.[Taylor & Francis Online] , [Google Scholar], Sequential Analysis). We have resorted to Mukhopadhyay and Duggan (1997 Mukhopadhyay, N. and Duggan, W. T. (1997). Can a Two-Stage Procedure Enjoy Second Order Properties? Sankhya, Series A 59: 435–448. [Google Scholar], Sankhya, Series A) in developing asymptotic second-order properties for the modified two-stage methodology and to nonlinear renewal theory of Lai and Siegmund (1977 Lai, T. L. and Siegmund, D. (1977). A Nonlinear Renewal Theory with Applications to Sequential Analysis I, Annals of Statistics 5: 946–954.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], 1979 Lai, T. L. and Siegmund, D. (1979). A Nonlinear Renewal Theory with Applications to Sequential Analysis II, Annals of Statistics 7: 60–76.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], Annals of Statistics) and Woodroofe (1977 Woodroofe, M. (1977). Second Order Approximation for Sequential Point and Interval Estimation, Annals of Statistics 5: 984–995.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], Annals of Statistics) in addressing analogous properties under the purely sequential methodology. Then, we supplement with extensive sets of data analysis via computer simulations validating that both modified two-stage and purely sequential methods perform very well. Both methodologies are also illustrated and implemented using real datasets from cancer studies and reliability analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.523
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.218
GPT teacher head0.449
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it