MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2518924120 · doi:10.7202/1040230ar

Les fonctions du tourisme obscur

2016· article· fr· W2518924120 on OpenAlexaff
Nathanaël Wadbled

Bibliographic record

VenueTéoros Revue de recherche en tourisme · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Identity and Heritage
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au-delà des études de cas, de nombreuses études générales sur le tourisme obscur s’attachent à définir sa fonction spécifique sociale et culturelle. Indépendamment des caractéristiques propres de chaque site visité, ou de chaque touriste, est alors défini un certain mode de relation au patrimoine. Il se distingue du tourisme culturel historique au sens où il n’est pas intéressé par la transmission d’un savoir historien contextualisé, mais par l’éducation à des valeurs morales ayant une dimension civique. Cette situation est l’occasion d’un certain nombre de critiques. Au niveau du contenu transmis, la mise en avant de la transmission de valeurs aurait comme effet une déhistoricisation des événements. Au niveau de la manière dont il est transmis, le tourisme obscur risquerait de devenir une pratique récréative, car cette éducation s’adresse au ressenti des visiteurs et non à leur intelligence réflexive.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.772
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.234
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.113 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTéoros Revue de recherche en tourismeSame topicCultural Identity and HeritageFrench-language works237,207