MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2518975127 · doi:10.22289/2446-922x.v1n1a1

A CONTEMPORANEIDADE ACERCA DA ADOLESCÊNCIA E A SEXUALIDADE

2015· article· pt· W2518975127 on OpenAlexaff
Tatiane Cristina da Silva, Delza Ferreira Mendes

Bibliographic record

VenuePsicologia e Saúde em Debate · 2015
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicScience and Education Research
Canadian institutionsChild, Adolescent and Family Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A sexualidade na adolescência contemporânea apresenta diversas configurações as quais levam o adolescente a permanecer na ilusão de imagens, incentivando-o a vivenciar a sexualidade no corpo e não em si por completo. O objetivo da pesquisa foi compreender como o adolescente contemporâneo lida com a sexualidade, e para isto foi utilizada como metodologia a revisão de literatura. O estudo apontou que a sexualidade é um dispositivo histórico e cultural, a qual tem características diferenciadas em cada sociedade. Evidenciou também que a adolescência é um período de transição caracterizada por diversas perdas e significativas mudanças, visando a construção do sujeito. E ficou claro ainda que a sexualidade na adolescência conceitua se a partir da relação do adolescente com o próprio corpo, com a mente e no relacionamento com os outros. Compreende se que o adolescente contemporâneo apresenta diversos dilemas, sendo assim a psicologia tem o papel de auxilialo no enfrentamento de barreiras.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.012
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.263
GPT teacher head0.433
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsicologia e Saúde em DebateSame topicScience and Education ResearchFrench-language works237,207