Bibliographic record
Abstract
Desde el siglo xvi hasta finales del siglo xviii la élite político-religiosa fundamentada en la cosmovisión judeocristiana rechazó con vehemencia La Celestina. La mayoría de receptores del mismo período esestimaron tales censuras y gozaron el texto integrándolo a sus vidas íntimas y sociales. Mediatizados por nuevos marcos de referencia, la recepción crítica de los siglos xx y xxi ha interpretado la obra como una transgresión de los discursos oficiales y la ha usado para celebrar, rechazar o subvertir ideas del espacio social y la subjetividad dentro del complejo cultural hispánico. La recepción precedente, la abundante crítica académica y la actualización de su argumento a través de adaptaciones y otras artes, además de confirmar su carácter de clásico, configuran una dinámica negociación de modelos de realidad. El propósito del presente artículo es determinar cómo Celestina afecta las concepciones de realidad de sus lectores. A través del análisis de la interacción texto-receptor este estudio ofrece un mejor entendimiento de la lectura realista. Unceasing realism: from Celestina to her receptionAbstract: From the sixteenth century to the end of the eighteenth century, the political and religious elite rooted in the Judeo-Christian worldview, vehemently rejected La Celestina. Ignoring such censorship, during this period most receptors enjoyed reading this work while integrating the text with their intimate and social lives. Mediated by new frameworks, critics of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries have interpreted the literary work as a transgression of official discourse using it to claim, reject, ignore or transcend dominant ideas of social space and subjectivity within the Hispanic complex. In addition to the foregoing various responses and abundant academic criticism that enrich this dynamic negotiation models of reality, the argument of Celestina is updated today through adaptations and other arts confirming her classic status. The purpose of this article is to determine how Celestina’s world affects the conceptions of Hispanic realities of her reception. Through the analysis of text/reader interaction this paper provides a better understanding of realist reading production.Keywords: Celestina, realist reading, critical reception, Hispanic Cultures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".