Louis Veuillot au collège classique : un enseignement littéraire et religieux, 1840-1970
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Louis Veuillot, bien connu des milieux journalistiques ultramontains, a aussi été reconnu pour son oeuvre littéraire. Les étudiants des collèges classiques québécois ont pu lire ses textes dans le cadre de leur cursus, en incluant les activités parascolaires. Cet article propose d’étudier l’intégration des textes du polémiste à l’éducation littéraire et religieuse de ces jeunes durant trois périodes, 1840-1871, 1910-1930 et 1950-1970. Alors que l’écrivain n’est pas inclus au programme au XIXe siècle, le début du XXe siècle est en quelque sorte l’âge d’or de la diffusion de Veuillot au collège classique, notamment lors des célébrations du centenaire de sa naissance en 1913. À cette époque, l’écrivain est érigé en modèle pour les jeunes, mais les années 1950 sonnent le glas de la diffusion de cet auteur dans les collèges. Néanmoins, durant quelques décennies, il a pu faire partie de la culture livresque des collégiens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".