MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2519288304 · doi:10.1080/2052546.2002.11932096

Reports

2002· article· en· W2519288304 on OpenAlex
Stephen E. Grasby, Eugene M. Gryba, R. K. Bezys

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePlains Anthropologist · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Canadian institutionsManitoba HydroGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyDevonianArchaeologyQuaternaryBedrockGlacial periodPaleontologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Swan River chert is a lithic material that was commonly utilized by precontact people on the southern part of the Canadian prairie provinces and the adjoining states since at least Clovis times. The chert occurs in glacial till and other Quaternary deposits within the area of use. It occurs in highest density west of lakes Winnipegosis and Manitoba. Archaeologists have speculated about its bedrock source at least since 1980. This paper describes one primary geological source of Swan River chert located in west-central Manitoba. Rather than a continuous bedded layer, the chert occurs in randomly distributed solution chimneys in Devonian carbonates of the Souris River Formation exposed in the Mafeking quarry, west-central Manitoba.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.856
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it