The prevalence of anxiety in patients with psoriasis: a systematic review of observational studies and clinical trials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Psoriasis and anxiety are chronic conditions with significant morbidity and there is evidence that they may exacerbate one another. There is little data on the prevalence of anxiety in psoriasis and the effect of psoriasis treatment on comorbid anxiety. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature to describe the prevalence and severity of clinical anxiety disorders or anxiety symptoms among adult patients with psoriasis and characterize the effect of anti-psoriatic interventions on clinical anxiety disorders or anxiety symptoms. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database using search terms 'psoriasis' and 'anxiety'. Results were tabulated and verified by two independent reviewers. Meta-analyses were not performed due to heterogeneity of data. Of 213 publications identified, 938 194 patients from 15 papers were included. The mean age ranged from 31.9-59.4 years old, with a mean PASI score of 7.65-22.8 (reported by nine studies) and a body surface area involvement of 25.9-39.8% (reported by two studies). The prevalence of anxiety in patients with psoriasis was 7-48%, which was significantly higher than healthy controls in two of three studies (HR 1.29-1.31, P = 0.001 and OR 2.91 [95% CI, 2.01-4.21], P < 0.001). Four of five studies (n = 2029) demonstrated an improvement in anxiety symptoms with psoriasis treatment. This review demonstrates a high prevalence of anxiety of adult patients with psoriasis suggesting that patients would benefit from systematic screening. Although the data suggest that anxiety may be improved through various psoriasis treatments, larger prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm this effect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".