MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2519635008 · doi:10.3968/8704

Research on Gender Differences of Labor Retired Intend in China

2016· article· en· W2519635008 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xiuyun Gong

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRetirement, Disability, and Employment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemographic economicsUnit (ring theory)Dependency ratioAffect (linguistics)ChinaConsumption (sociology)Value (mathematics)Carry (investment)PopulationEconomicsLabour economicsPsychologyDemographyGeographySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using the sampling survey data of 30 provinces and cities in 2015, it studied the influence factors of different sex worker retirement intend in our country. The empirical results show that age, level of the education, health, dependency ratio of the population, people of independent source of income, unit properties, working conditions will affect significantly for both men and women, but there is another bigger difference. The level of leisure consumption and the expected retirement age have a great effect on the retirement age relatively consistent. The Conclusion of research of this paper is helpful to understand the public’s retirement will, to provide certain reference value to carry out the reform of the retirement age.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.180
Threshold uncertainty score0.830

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.404
GPT teacher head0.538
Teacher spread0.133 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicRetirement, Disability, and EmploymentFrench-language works237,207