A Novel Grain-Oriented Lamination Rotor Core Assembly for a Synchronous Reluctance Traction Motor With a Reduced Torque Ripple Algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High torque density and low torque ripple are crucial for traction applications, which allow electrified powertrains to perform properly during start-up, acceleration, and cruising. High-quality anisotropic magnetic materials such as cold-rolled grain-oriented electrical steels can be used for achieving higher efficiency, torque density, and compactness in synchronous reluctance motors equipped with transverse laminated rotors. However, the rotor cylindrical geometry makes utilization of these materials with pole numbers higher than two more difficult. From a reduced torque ripple viewpoint, particular attention to the rotor slot pitch angle design can lead to improvements. This paper presents an innovative rotor lamination design and assembly using cold-rolled grain-oriented electrical steel to achieve higher torque density along with an algorithm for rotor slot pitch angle design for reduced torque ripple. The design methods and prototyping process are discussed, finite-element analyses and experimental examinations are carried out, and the results are compared to verify and validate the proposed methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".