MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2519802803 · doi:10.7202/1073902ar

L’évocation de la mort par l’architecture

2020· article· fr· W2519802803 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Maurice Lagueux

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontières · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Après une réflexion sur le rôle de l’architecture conçue comme un art qui a pour fonction de répondre aux besoins des vivants dans l’exercice de leur activité quotidienne, ce texte s’intéresse à la façon dont cet art – fréquemment associé à la sculpture à cette fin – se charge également de perpétuer la mémoire des défunts. Puisque l’oeuvre architecturale est forcément indissociable du lieu où elle est érigée, une attention particulière sera portée aux types de lieu retenus pour l’érection des monuments. Seront considérés successivement le lieu de la mort, le lieu de l’inhumation et les lieux qui ont valeur symbolique eu égard à la vie des disparus. La réflexion mettra l’accent sur les façons très variées dont l’architecture parvient à mettre en relief les dimensions diverses de notre relation à la mort et à ceux qui nous ont précédés.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.788
Threshold uncertainty score0.880

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontièresSame topicDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningFrench-language works237,207