MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2519883868 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.93.014319

Combined high-resolution laser spectroscopy and nuclear decay spectroscopy for the study of the low-lying states in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Fr</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>206</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>,<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>At</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>202</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>, and<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Bi</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>198</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>

2016· article· lv· W2519883868 on OpenAlexfundno aff
K. M. Lynch, T. E. Cocolios, J. Billowes, M. L. Bissell, I. Budinčević, T. Day Goodacre, R. P. de Groote, G. J. Farooq-Smith, V. N. Fedosseev, K. T. Flanagan, S. Franchoo, R. F. García Ruíz, H. Heylen, Ruohong Li, B. A. Marsh, G. Neyens, R. E. Rossel, S. Rothe, H. H. Stroke, K. Wendt, S. G. Wilkins, X. F. Yang

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2016
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSeventh Framework ProgrammeEuropean Research CouncilFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekScience and Technology Facilities CouncilVlaamse regeringYork UniversityKU LeuvenNew York University
KeywordsSpectroscopyHyperfine structurePhysicsAtomic physicsHigh resolutionIsotopeGround stateBranching fractionIonizationResolution (logic)Nuclear physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.007
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0090.008
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0090.012
Research integrity0.0050.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207