Multicontrast reconstruction using compressed sensing with low rank and spatially varying edge-preserving constraints for high-resolution MR characterization of myocardial infarction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To enable robust reconstruction for highly accelerated three-dimensional multicontrast late enhancement imaging to provide improved MR characterization of myocardial infarction with isotropic high spatial resolution. THEORY AND METHODS: A new method using compressed sensing with low rank and spatially varying edge-preserving constraints (CS-LASER) is proposed to improve the reconstruction of fine image details from highly undersampled data. CS-LASER leverages the low rank feature of the multicontrast volume series in MR relaxation and integrates spatially varying edge preservation into the explicit low rank constrained compressed sensing framework using weighted total variation. With an orthogonal temporal basis pre-estimated, a multiscale iterative reconstruction framework is proposed to enable the practice of CS-LASER with spatially varying weights of appropriate accuracy. RESULTS: In in vivo pig studies with both retrospective and prospective undersamplings, CS-LASER preserved fine image details better and presented tissue characteristics with a higher degree of consistency with histopathology, particularly in the peri-infarct region, than an alternative technique for different acceleration rates. An isotropic resolution of 1.5 mm was achieved in vivo within a single breath-hold using the proposed techniques. CONCLUSION: Accelerated three-dimensional multicontrast late enhancement with CS-LASER can achieve improved MR characterization of myocardial infarction with high spatial resolution. Magn Reson Med 78:598-610, 2017. © 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".