MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2519945036 · doi:10.17760/d20215029

Rethinking the architecture of the web

2016· dissertation· en· W2519945036 on OpenAlexaff
Liang Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsScience North
FundersMax Planck Institute for Software Systems
KeywordsWorld Wide WebWeb APIWeb developmentWeb serviceComputer scienceJavaScriptWeb standardsWeb application securityWeb modelingWeb 2.0Web pageUploadWS-PolicyService providerData WebWeb serverInternet privacyService (business)The InternetBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past two decades, web technologies have evolved dramatically and have changed what we see and how we interact with the web. The web browser today works akin to a software distribution platform, running web applications written in JavaScript and rendered with HTML and CSS. Web services, ranging from online social networks, to video hubs, to e-commerce sites, enable content sharing for billions of people on an unprecedented scale. However, despite these massive changes, the web is still implicitly built around the premise of a client--server architecture, where web browsers are clients and service providers play the server role. Therefore, popular service providers face significant monetary burdens, but frequently keep their services free for users. Instead, the service providers often monetize the content that users upload to support advertising. As a result, the traditional client--server architecture of the web that is widely used today has significant implications for the privacy, security, and economics of the entire web ecosystem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.534
Threshold uncertainty score0.320

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207