MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Effectiveness, Time Utilization and Clinical Outcome of Partial Manual Red Cell Exchange in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease

2011· article· en· W2519945198 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kevin H.M. Kuo, David Barth, Richard Ward

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePhlebotomyAnemiaAnemia of chronic diseasePulmonary hypertensionInternal medicineSurgeryIron deficiency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 2326 Introduction: Red cell exchange transfusion (RBCX) is used to treat and prevent selected complications from Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) where there is a need to reduce hemoglobin S level, blood viscosity, improve oxygen carrying capacity, and to avoid rapid iron overload from simple transfusions. Partial manual red cell exchange is sometimes employed in the chronic maintenance of low hemoglobin S levels. Data on the efficacy and clinical outcome of SCD patients on partial manual RBCX are limited. Methods: All partial manual RBCX from the University Health Network, a SCD comprehensive care center between April 1st, 2010 and April 30th, 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were exchanged at a frequency of 4 to 6 weeks where each session consists of two 500cc phlebotomy with an infusion of 500cc normal saline in between the phlebotomies, and transfusion of 2 units of packed red cells (pRBC). The procedure was repeated until pre-RBCX hemoglobin S (HbS) level <50% was reached (for patients without overt stroke for >4 years). Phlebotomy was reduced or omitted during episodes of symptomatic anemia at the discretion of the treating hematologist. Patients with poor venous access had indwelling line with chronic, therapeutic anticoagulation against line-related thrombosis. Results: Nineteen patients (16 HbSS, 2 HbSC, 1 HbSD) totalling 176 exchange sessions were reviewed. Indications for RBCX include primary and secondary stroke prevention (n = 14), recurrent painful vaso-occlusive crises intolerant or refractory to hydroxyurea (n = 3), pulmonary hypertension confirmed on right heart catheterization with hypoxia (n = 1), and prevention of intrahepatic cholestasis in a liver allograft (n = 1). Mean frequency of RBCX was 4.8 weeks (95% CI 3.9, 5.6 weeks). There were 2 transfusion-related (fever, pruritis) and 1 phlebotomy-related (pre-syncope) adverse events. There were 23 partial/cancelled phlebotomy sessions, mostly due to symptomatic anemia. Mean post-RBCX hematocrit was 0.296 (95% CI 0.280, 0.312) and pre-RBCX HbS level was 0.439 (95% CI 0.387, 0.490). Pre-RBCX HbS level of <50% was achieved in 74% of exchanges. Reasons for not achieving the target HbS level include: exchange interval >4.0 weeks, not on any transfusion regime prior to initiating partial manual RBCX, reduced or no phlebotomy in previous session, and non-adherence to treatment. Patients who were adherent to treatment had no recurrent events related to their initial indication for RBCX (one patient has possible Moyamoya formation but no clinically overt stroke), while 3 of the 6 patients who were not adherent had events during the study period (2 had painful vaso-occlusive crisis requiring hospital admission and 1 had new Moyamoya-like changes on cerebral angiogram). It took a median time of 90 minutes to phlebotomize 1,000cc whole blood and 176 minutes to transfuse two units of pRBC. There was no significant difference between the time required to phlebotomize or transfuse via peripheral vein versus an indwelling line (55 vs. 53 minutes/500cc; P = 0.7572 and 88 minutes vs. 88 minutes/unit; P = 0.9859). Eleven patients were also on iron chelation therapy for iron overload from previous simple transfusion, and patients who were adherent to RBCX (n = 7) had either a stable or reduction in ferritin level. Discussion: Patients who are adherent on partial manual RBCX can maintain a pre-RBCX HbS <50% with good clinical outcomes and low rates of adverse events, reduced blood consumption compared to automated RBCX, and obviate the need for ongoing iron chelation in those without pre-existing iron overload. In patients with iron overload, RBCX combined with iron chelation therapy can maintain iron balance. In patients with good peripheral venous access, indwelling lines do not confer an advantage to the speed of phlebotomy or transfusion. Patient with pre-RBCX HbS level >50% may benefit from a single session of automated RBCX to “reset” their HbS level before commencing chronic partial manual RBCX. Further prospective studies will aim to determine the rate of new or progressive silent infarcts and vasculopathy and reduction of iron balance via partial manual RBCX. Disclosures: Kuo: Novartis Canada: Research Funding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders→French-language works237,207→