Part-level Sequence Dependent Setup Time Reduction in CMS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the idea of creating cells while reducing part-level sequence-dependent setup time in general cellular manufacturing systems (CMS). Setup time reduction in CMS has gained modest attention in the literature. This could be attributed to the fact that the fundamental problem in cell formation in CMS has been mainly related to material handling and machine utilization while setup time was assumed to implicitly decrease as a result of grouping similar parts in a manufacturing cell. Despite more than three decades of CMS’s history, it has been relatively recent that setup time has been included in cell formation problems and found a place in the existing models. However, sequence-dependent setup time in the literature has been dealt with mostly within the context of scheduling “part-families” in a single manufacturing cell or in the allocation of parts to flow line cells. The present model includes the three fundamental elements of a cell formation procedure: machine utilization, intercellular movement and setup time. This therefore provides a basic structure that would serve as a general sub-model for real manufacturing cell formation problems including any type of setup time and manufacturing cell. Due to computation time and complexity of the problem, a solution approach based on theGenetic Algorithm based (GA-based)heuristic has been discussed and the solution of a sample problem has been compared with that of conventional optimization software. The results indicate a reasonably satisfactory performance by the GAbased heuristic in terms of accuracy and computation time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".