PERBEDAAN TEKANAN DARAH SEBELUM DAN SESUDAH PEMBERIAN TEKNIK RELAKSASI IMAJINASI TERBIMBING PADA LANSIA YANG MENDERITA HIPERTENSI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRAKPenyakit hipertensi pada Lansia memerlukan penanganan tanpa menimbulkan efek samping yang bertujuan untuk mencegah terjadinya morbiditas dan mortalitas serta mempertahankan tekanan darah normal.Salah satu teknik yang dapat digunakan adalah teknik relaksasi imajinasi terbimbing (guided imaginary). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan tekanan darah sebelum dan sesudah pemberian teknik relaksasi imajinasi terbimbing pada Lansia yang menderita hipertensi.Penelitian ini menggunakan desain penelitian eksperimental dengan pre-experiment design. Sampel dalam penelitian ini menggunakan tekhnik purposive sampling menggunakan sebanyak 30 orang Lansia yang mengalami hipertensi di Wilayah Kerja UPTD Puskesmas Kertajati Kabupaten Majalengka. Data ini diambil menggunakan lembar observasi tekanan darah. Setelah itu dilakukan uji statistik yang menggunakan uji beda yaitu Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test dengan tingkat kemaknaan 0,05.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan rata-rata tekanan darah sebelum pemberian teknik relaksasi imajinasi terbimbing sebesar 154,9 dan sebagian besar responden mengalami hipertensi Stadium I (60,0%). Sementara rata-rata tekanan darah pada Lansia yang menderita hipertensi sesudah pemberian teknik relaksasi imajinasi terbimbing sebesar 143,3 dan sebagian besar responden mengalami prehipertensi (46,7%). Hasil uji hipotesis menunjukkan ada perbedaan tekanan darah sebelum dan sesudah pemberian teknik relaksasi imajinasi terbimbing pada Lansia yang menderita hipertensi di Wilayah Kerja UPTD Puskesmas Kertajati Kabupaten Majalengka Tahun 2014 (rvalue = 0,008).Oleh karena itu perawat di Puskesmas dapat mengaplikasikan teknik relaksasi imajinasi terbimbing dalam membantu menurunkan tekanan darah pada pasien yang mengalami hipertensi Kata kunci : Tekanan Darah, Hipertensi, Imajinasi Terbimbing ABSTRACTHypertension of elderly needs handling without giving an effects for prevent morbidity and mortality and for maintain normal blood pressure. One of technique which can be used is a guided imaginary. The research is for determine differences of blood pressure before and after giving guided imaginary for elderly suffering hypertension. This research is used experimental with pre-experiment design. Sample in this research is purposive sampling technique method using as many as 30 people for the elderly that experienced hypertension in the work area of the UPTD Puskesmas Kertajati Majalengka. In this data is taken by using sheet of observation blood pressure. After that performed statistical test that using wilcoxon signed rank test with significance level 0,05.The result shows average is 154,9 and most of respondents have hypertension Stadium I (60,0%). While, averages of elderly blood pressure is 143,3 after giving guided imaginary technique and most of respondents have prehypertension (46,7%). The result of hypothesis test shows there are differences blood pressure before and after giving guided imaginary technique for elderly suffering hypertension in work area UPTD Puskesmas Kertajati Kabupaten Majalengka years 2014 (pvalue=0,008)Therefore, nurses in Puskesmas can apply guided imaginary technique for lowers blood pressure for patients who have hypertension. Key words : Blood Pressure, Hypertension, Guided Imaginary
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".