MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

“Can migrants act?”. Presenza, organizzazione, visibilità in un orizzonte precario

2016· article· it· W2519973469 on OpenAlexaff
Filippo Furri

Bibliographic record

VenueREMHU Revista Interdisciplinar da Mobilidade Humana · 2016
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicItalian Social Issues and Migration
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesJungleSubalternAgency (philosophy)Political scienceSociologyArtHistorySocial scienceLawPoliticsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Riassunto L'articolo prende spunto dalla vicenda della jungle di Calais per interrogare i margini e le condizioni di un agire migrante nell'orizzonte europeo. Riferendosi al celebre articolo di Spivak “Can Subaltern Speak”, il contributo vuole considerare il processo di neutralizzazione (giuridica e esistenziale) che investe il migrante nelle sue varie fasi e situazioni di accesso alla società di “accoglienza”, e il suo impatto sulla soggettività migrante, prima di illustrare alcune declinazioni di un agency che cerca di smarcarsi rispetto al dispositivo in essere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.016
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueREMHU Revista Interdisciplinar da Mobilidade HumanaSame topicItalian Social Issues and MigrationFrench-language works237,207