MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2520049607 · doi:10.1177/2041419616666339

Improved procedure for calculating the cleared pressure acting on a finite target due to a mid-field blast

2016· article· en· W2520049607 on OpenAlexaff
Yazan Qasrawi, Pat J. Heffernan

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Protective Structures · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Response to Dynamic Loads
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClearanceBlast waveImpulse (physics)Structural engineeringEngineeringObstacleFinite element methodRange (aeronautics)ClearingAerospace engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For a structure subjected to it, a blast shockwave may be the severest load it will experience in its service life. A structure inadequately designed against blast may experience extensive damage and, in extreme cases, may collapse completely. Ensuring an adequate design depends on the accurate prediction of the blast shockwave and the loads it will impart on the structure. Blast shockwaves, however, are notoriously difficult to predict. The difficulties arise in part due to the reflected pressure and impulse developed by a blast shockwave depending on the obstacle’s response and geometry. Clearing is a result of the blast shockwave propagating around the edge of an obstacle, thus reducing the pressure build up from what would develop on an infinite surface. Thus, a clearer understanding of this phenomenon, and a simple practical method for predicting it, would improve blast load predictions and aid in blast resistant design. There are several experimental studies reported in the literature investigating this phenomenon. The studies, however, are limited to small scale blasts, and the prediction tools they propose are complicated to use. This article extends the range of available results numerically using ANSYS Autodyn, and proposes a tool to aid the blast resistant design engineer in more accurately quantifying the cleared blast loads imparted on a structure or structural element. Thus, after validating that Autodyn was suitable for investigating clearing problems, a series of two-dimensional models were built to investigate the parameters affecting clearing. The parameters investigated were the range, blast scaled distance, and distance to the edge of the target. The results of the numerical study resulted in a design aid for determining the cleared blast shockwave pressure on a finite target a given distance from the edge. The design aid proposed in this article is simple and applicable over a wide range of scaled distances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Protective StructuresSame topicStructural Response to Dynamic LoadsFrench-language works237,207