Spin Catalysis over Conductive Solids: Enhancing the Rate of Model C−C Bond Cracking over Carbon Nanoparticles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The concept of catalysis over a spin‐conductive mediator is investigated with quantum‐chemical calculations. Specifically, homolytic C−C bond cleavage in ethane over small edge‐oxidized half‐metallic carbon clusters in the presence of a methyl radical was considered with the complete active space self‐consistent field method. The methyl radical (spin catalyst) and carbon cluster (mediator) are found to share a common electronic orbital containing the radical unpaired electron, allowing nascent radicals emerging from ethane dissociation to interact with the spin catalyst through the carbon electronic system. This could result in spin flip, affording formation of a triplet radical pair not prone to recombination and thus resulting in the acceleration of the reaction rate. This demonstrates that new pathways may open up in controlled catalytic processes by allowing normally spin‐forbidden reactions and not necessarily lowering activation barriers in the traditional sense of catalysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".