MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2520116375 · doi:10.2118/180451-pa

Vapor-Phase Combustion in Accelerating Rate Calorimetry for Air-Injection Enhanced-Oil-Recovery Processes

2016· article· en· W2520116375 on OpenAlexaff
Sayantan Bhattacharya, D. G. Mallory, R.G. Moore, M.G. Ursenbach, S. A. Mehta

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVaporizationCombustionChemistryThermodynamicsHeat transferAtmospheric temperature rangeCalorimetryDiffusionAsphaltMass transferAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceOrganic chemistryChromatographyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary The accelerating rate calorimeter (ARC) is unique for its versatility of operation and application—reliability, validity, and accuracy of results—caused by very-high adiabaticity. Accelerating rate calorimetry is one of the screening tests used to determine the suitability of a reservoir for air-injection enhanced oil recovery. The ARC is well-suited for investigating the reaction mechanisms in the low-temperature range (LTR), negative-temperature-gradient region (NTGR), and high-temperature range (HTR). The ARC provides full time–temperature, time–pressure, and self-heat rate-inverse absolute-temperature profiles. An experimental and simulation study is carried out to expand knowledge and interpretation of the data derived from high-pressure closed ARC tests. Athabasca bitumen is used for the experimental study in a closed ARC at an initial pressure of 13.8 MPag (2,000 psig) to identify the nature of the oxidation reactions occurring over the different temperature ranges. The simulation component of the study focused on the development of a numerical model that captured the elements of the ARC test. The model incorporated solubility of oxygen and diffusion to control the transfer of oxygen in the liquid-oil phase. Mass transfer is found to play an important role at low temperatures up to the temperature at which chemical interaction starts to control the distribution of oxygen within the liquid bitumen. Likewise, vaporization of oil and generation of vapor by cracking reactions are also believed to play an important role in air-injection processes. Therefore, a vapor-phase combustion reaction is integrated into the traditional Belgrave kinetic model. This modified model predicted that the combustion of vaporized oil integrated with its flammable limits and the rate of diffusion of the vaporized component in the gas phase. The results of this study indicate that, with the addition of mass transfer to the kinetic model, it is possible to predict the NTGR. The result showed that solubility and diffusion of oxygen played an important role up to a temperature of 125°C at which chemical reactions started to control the distribution of oxygen within the liquid bitumen. The results also showed that vapor-phase combustion creates a temperature gradient between the gas and bitumen phases when vaporized components became flammable (stoichiometry). This showed that the ARC could be an effective tool for understanding liquid and vapor-phase reaction and their relative importance in different temperature regimes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.793

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Reservoir Evaluation & EngineeringSame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207