MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2520208362 · doi:10.3968/8714

Study on the Construction Waste Logistics Cost Accounting Based on Activity-Based Costing

2016· article· en· W2520208362 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yu Gu, Yanlin Zeng

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicQuality and Supply Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActivity-based costingCost accountingManagement accountingBusinessTotal absorption costingEnvironmental full-cost accountingCost–volume–profit analysisControl (management)Accounting methodCost driverTarget costingAccounting information systemProduct cost managementAccountingOperations managementThroughput accountingComputer scienceCost engineeringEngineeringAccounting management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The construction waste logistics cost accounting is critical to the control of logistics cost. At present, researches on the construction waste logistics cost accounting are still relatively locking, and it has been a problem. Activity-Basic Costing, a scientific and systematic method for cost management, has some superiority compared with the traditional method. In view of the present situation of construction waste logistics cost accounting in China, the author investigated the situation of construction waste in Kunming, and established a system of logistics cost accounting based on the basic principle of activity-based costing. The author discussed and analyzed the application of activity-basic costing in construction waste logistics cost accounting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicQuality and Supply ManagementFrench-language works237,207