MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Contribution à l'estimation des substances appauvrissant la couche d'ozone (SAO) au Togo de 2000 à 2005

2008· article· fr· W2520228995 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kokou Sabi, Ayité-Lô Ajavon

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironnement Ingénierie & Développement · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Policies and Emissions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceForestryArtGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nos estimations, réalisées dans le cadre des activités de recherche du Laboratoire de chimie atmosphérique de la Faculté des sciences de l'université de Lomé, sont une contribution à la concrétisation de la volonté du gouvernement togolais qui a ratifié la Convention de Vienne et le Protocole de Montréal relatifs aux substances appauvrissant la couche d'ozone (SAO) ainsi que tous ses amendements.Au titre de l'année 2005, la consommation du Togo en SAO est de 934,754 tonnes PAO soit 0,000179 tonnes PAO par habitant. Les SAO consommées proviennent exclusivement de l'importation qui est soit légale soit illicite. Utilisées essentiellement pour la réfrigération et la climatisation, les SAO se répartissent comme suit :— 0,096 tonne métrique de CFC-11 ;— 916,704 tonnes métriques de CFC-12 ;— 326,437 tonnes métriques de HCFC-22.Si pour d'autres secteurs d'activité il n'existe pas de données accessibles, la porosité de nos frontières permet de soupçonner l'utilisation d'autres SAO. C'est le cas par exemple des halons et du bromure de méthyle.Le Togo peut contrôler et revoir à la baisse sa consommation en SAO par l'amélioration du Programme de Pays qui puisse aboutir à d'autres possibilités de projets de financement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.527
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironnement Ingénierie & DéveloppementSame topicEnvironmental Policies and EmissionsFrench-language works237,207