MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2520275205 · doi:10.4000/rfsic.2078

Retour sur le concept de transaction

2016· article· fr· W2520275205 on OpenAlexaffabout
Benoît Cordelier

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue française des sciences de l’information et de la communication · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La transaction est une notion importée de plusieurs courants de recherche à l’intersection de l’économie et de la sociologie ou encore de la psychologie. Dans la francophonie, elle est dynamique en sociologie à travers le concept de transaction sociale. En SIC, ou plus particulièrement en communication des organisations, bien que ce qu’il est maintenant convenu d’appeler l’École de Montréal en a fait une notion importante du modèle conversation/texte, elle a connu une diffusion timide en dehors de sa définition courante. Pourtant un enrichissement mutuel entre les différents courants est possible à la fois sur le plan épistémologique et conceptuel. Qui plus est elle pourrait être une notion centrale pour conceptualiser la performativité de la communication organisationnelle aussi bien en termes de pouvoir, de coopération ou de conflit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScholarly communication
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.023
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.153
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue française des sciences de l’information et de la communicationSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207