Revisiting the Best Interests of the Child Principle
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Supreme Court of Canada has addressed the best interests of the child in dozens of cases and in 2015 revisited the principle in the context of an extradition case and an immigration case. In MM v United States of America the issue was whether a mother should be extradited to the US state of Georgia to face charges of interference with the father’s custodial rights. In Kanthasamy v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) the issue was whether a 17-year-old should be exempted from the requirement that permanent residence applications be made outside of Canada. A far more expansive approach to the best interests of the child principle was taken in the latter case. The different approaches to the best interests of the child principle taken in the two cases can be explained in part by the different contexts and statutory frameworks. As well, the cases evince different understandings of the appropriate role of courts in judicial review of decisions made by the executive branch of government.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it