Design and analysis of standing wave quarter wavelength thermoacoustic engine
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thermoacoustics have been recent area of investigationsdue to its noticeable advantages like simplicity, structural stability, absence of moving component, high reliability, minimal or no maintenance etc. In addition to these, thermoacoustic devices can use different noble gases and their mixtures as working fluid as well as they can use low grade energy sources such as solar energy, exhaust gas of an automobile, waste heat etc. Incurrent work, design of quarter wavelength standing wave type thermoacoustic engine stack, using the linear thermoacoustic theory, is described. A set of dimensionless parameters has been used toreduce large number of dependent parameters. The design procedure followed here can be a guide fordesign and development of thermoacoustic engines. Various operating parameters such asmean pressure, frequency, driving ratio, hot and cold end temperatures of stack areused to investigate parameters such as length of stack, position of stack, and efficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it