Family Evaluation Of Hospitalized Elderly With Encephalic Vascular Accident Under Palliative Care
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: evaluate the structure, the development and the functionality in families of hospitalized elderly patients with vascular encephalic accident under palliative care. Method: qualitative field research conducted with five families. Data were collected through the technique of interview, genogram and ecomap. The empirical material was analyzed in light of the Calgary Family Assessment Model. Results: it was verified that the participant families of the study retained the nuclear structure; presented low and education levels and financial difficulties. However, two families showed better economic conditions. As for the social support network, majority mentioned relatives, friends and the church. All referred to have conflictual family relationships. The family caregivers are females, specially daughters-in-law and daughters. Final Considerations: The structural, developmental and functional evaluation of the families in the study provide a space for nursing intervention in the hospital context for the families of hospitalized elderly with cerebral vascular accident. Descritores: Relações familiares; Idoso; Cuidados paliativos. Descriptors: Family Relationships; Elderly; Palliative Care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".