MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2520409964 · doi:10.1109/wcnc.2016.7565089

MMSE hybrid precoder design for millimeter-wave massive MIMO systems

2016· article· en· W2520409964 on OpenAlexaff
Ruikai Mai, Duy H. N. Nguyen, Tho Le‐Ngoc

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBasebandMIMOOrthogonalityMinimum mean square errorAlgorithmComputer sciencePrecodingMean squared errorControl theory (sociology)MathematicsMathematical optimizationChannel (broadcasting)Topology (electrical circuits)Bandwidth (computing)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies hybrid RF/baseband linear pre-coding design to minimize the mean square error (MSE) for millimeter-wave massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems using optimal linear equalizer. Instead of dealing with the objective function of sum MSE, which involves matrix inverses, we approach this problem by minimizing the Euclidean distance between the hybrid precoder and the optimal minimum MSE precoder. In an effort to impose the optimal structure of channel diagonalization, we separate the design of modulus-constrained RF precoder from the design of unconstrained baseband pre-coder. Magnitude-least-squares approximation is introduced to formulate the RF precoder design problem, and is subsequently transformed into a simultaneous matrix diagonalization problem. Such transformation enables application of a simple and numerically stable Jacobi-like algorithm. The effective channel representing a cascade of the derived RF precoder and the MIMO channel, is diagonalized by the baseband precoder. The error performance of the proposed solution is examined by numerical results where the effectiveness is verified by its closeness to the optimal design and its noticeable gain over sparse approximation based schemes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.811
Threshold uncertainty score0.524

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207