MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2520420524 · doi:10.1109/icccn.2016.7568513

EDASH: Energy-Aware QoE Optimization for Adaptive Video Delivery over LTE Networks

2016· article· en· W2520420524 on OpenAlexaff
Jian Song, Yong Cui, Zongpeng Li, Yayun Bao, Lanshan Zhang, Yangjun Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGreen IT and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceQuality of experienceComputer networkDynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTPEnergy consumptionThroughputQuality of serviceEfficient energy useDashBandwidth (computing)Real-time computingWirelessOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP (DASH) has emerged as a popular Internet video service, constituting a growing fraction of LTE network traffic today. We identify the root causes of DASH performance problems in bit-ate stability, energy consumption of User Equipment (UE) and efficiency of bandwidth utilization, from both the users' and network operators' perspectives. Unlike the existing researches that separately studied two important performance metrics in DASH, i.e., Quality of Experience (QoE) and UEs' energy consumption. We propose an energy-aware DASH delivery framework over LTE networks (EDASH), jointly optimizing the network throughput, users' QoE and UEs' energy efficiency. We formulate the bandwidth allocation problem as a nonlinear integer program, and design the EDASH Online Allocation algorithm (EOA). EOA assigns bandwidth based on channel conditions and buffer occupancy of UEs to achieve efficient video delivery among multiple users. Furthermore, we present the detailed design and implementation of EDASH using Apache HTTP server and Android smartphones. Both simulation and experiment results reveal that our scheme can improve the network throughput while striking a better balance between users' QoE and UEs' energy consumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.381

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGreen IT and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207