MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2520428974 · doi:10.3138/jcfs.43.5.673

Between Law and Custom: Women, Family Law and Marriage in Pakistan

2012· article· en· W2520428974 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Filomena M. Critelli

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Comparative Family Studies · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDemographic Trends and Gender Preferences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutonomyHuman rightsDomestic violenceAgency (philosophy)Gender studiesLawSociologyNarrativeFamily lawPolitical sciencePoison controlSuicide preventionSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, women’s marriage experiences in Pakistan, specifically their agency and autonomy to enter and terminate their marriages, were examined. Qualitative interviews with 15 women living in a shelter in Pakistan were used to analyze women’s rights in marriage as articulated in the law and the manner in which they are experienced in practice. A significant gap between women’s de jure rights and de facto exercise of their rights is revealed. Women who transgress narrowly defined boundaries of behavior by exercising their rights encountered violence, family estrangement and stigmatization. Shifting attitudes among women and a desire for greater self-determination regarding their marriages emerged from the narratives. Strengthening the legal framework and rule of law and mass public education regarding legal and human rights in Pakistan are recommended to protect women’s rights and elevate the status of women in the family and society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.161
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Comparative Family StudiesSame topicDemographic Trends and Gender PreferencesFrench-language works237,207