MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2520485192

The Horizon of Expectations of Paintings' Audiences in Picture-Reading Era

2016· article· en· W2520485192 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wei Jiao

Bibliographic record

VenueHigher education of social science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAesthetic Perception and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdmirationCopyingPaintingTasteHorizonReading (process)AestheticsCharm (quantum number)IdeologyFeature (linguistics)ArtVisual artsLiteraturePsychologyPolitical sciencePhilosophyLawLinguisticsMathematicsPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Horizon of expectations has never been so complicated: The public aesthetic taste gets diversified; image information explodes; the overloading of image information leads to aesthetic fatigue. The most fundamental feature of art in the copying era is the disappearance of charm, audiences’ horizon of expectations in the admiration of a painting is denied, which essentially is an aesthetic shock. Add the distance between artworks and the public’s horizon of expectations can make the Paintings find ways to survive in the society where the public cannot concentrate because of aesthetic fatigue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.612
Threshold uncertainty score0.506

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHigher education of social scienceSame topicAesthetic Perception and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207