MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2520501270

A Complaint of Żahir- Bibars Mahallah in Damascus in Connection with Moral Corruption

2012· article· en· W2520501270 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mohannad al-Mubaidin

Bibliographic record

VenueJordan Journal for History and Archaeology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeology and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComplaintLanguage changePolitical scienceQuarter (Canadian coin)LawPsychologyHistoryPhilosophyLinguistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study attempts to evaluate a rare document that dates back to Tuesday, the fifth of Sha'ban 1164 AH, (29 June 1751). The document is a complaint reported by the Al-Żahir-Bibars Mahallah quarter to Damascus Judge, regarding moral corruption in the town. Its significance lies in demonstrating the process undertaken in this case, and the role of learned people in such issues; in addition it deals with the measures adopted by the Judge and theologians who supported the demands of the Mahallah. The document also presents issues of social importance. The study consists of an introduction, three chapters and a conclusion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.865
Threshold uncertainty score0.560

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJordan Journal for History and ArchaeologySame topicArchaeology and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207