A Comparative Reactivity Survey of Some Prominent Bisphosphine Nickel(II) Precatalysts in C–N Cross-Coupling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The synthesis and characterization of the new air-stable precatalyst ( L1 )Ni( o -tol)Cl ( C1; where L1 = JosiPhos CyPF-Cy) is reported, along with the results of a comparative reactivity survey involving C1 and analogous PAd-DalPhos- and DPPF-containing precatalysts ( C2 and C3, respectively) in representative nickel-catalyzed C(sp 2 )–N cross-coupling reactions. Precatalyst C1 was found to be competitive with, and in some cases complementary to, C2 in the monoarylation of ammonia and primary alkylamines with (hetero)aryl chlorides, including in otherwise challenging room temperature transformations. (Pseudo)halide comparison studies involving the cross-coupling of furfurylamine at room temperature revealed that in contrast to C2 precatalyst C1 performs less effectively with aryl bromides. Whereas C3 was found to be ineffective for such transformations, this DPPF-derived precatalyst proved superior to C1 and C2 in reactions involving the secondary dialkylamine test substrate morpholine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".