Learning Mobility to the Global South: the need for intense follow-up and guidance of students
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In most countries and regions in the global North (U.S.A., Canada, Australia, UK, Europe) there has been an enormous growth in the numbers of students and young people in general requesting a meaningful cross-cultural experience. More particularly, over the last decade, one observes an increasing interest in so-called North-South learning mobility, between ‘industrialised’ and so-called ‘non-industrialised’ countries in the South. The University College Leuven anticipated this trend, organising an Advanced Bachelor ‘International Cooperation North South’ which consists of an intensive two-month preparation of students and a six-month work placement and research project in a (development) organisation in the South. Based on its long-term experience with sending students to the south, Leuven University College has elaborated a sound vision on North-South learning mobility of young people. It adopts a holistic approach by focussing on what are considered to be the fundamental aspects for organising qualitative North-South mobility: a good (substantive as well as methodological) preparation trajectory for outgoing students, close follow-up of students during and after their stay in the South; and sustainable partnerships with receiving organisations and institutions in the southern countries. In this paper, the Advanced Bachelor ‘International Cooperation North South’ is presented as ‘good practice’. As such, the paper aims at sharing expertise with other HEI involved or interested in organising Learning mobility of students with the South. Background and context In most countries and regions in the global North (U.S.A., Canada, Australia, Europe) there has been a dramatic growth in the numbers of students requesting a meaningful cross-cultural experience [1]. Since the late 1980’s there has been an ever growing interest in, and support for, organised international learning mobility of students within HEI in Europe. More particularly, over the last decade, one observes an increasing interest in so-called North-South mobility, between ‘industrialised’ and so-called ‘non-industrialised’ countries in the South. In Flanders in particular, within higher education, up to 1700 students travel to the South. Also outside the framework of higher education, the demand rises for so-called gap years, international experiences, intercultural tourism, and volunteering in the South [2]. The interest in this particular type of international mobility has been taken up in future European educational policies such as “Erasmus for all” (E4A) [3] and Horizon 2020. ‘Erasmus for all’ (20142020) has been launched by the European commission to facilitate “learning mobility of students with the purpose of strengthening the EU as an advanced knowledge society, with sustainable economic development, more and better jobs and greater social cohesion. To achieve these goals, E4A will increasingly promote learning mobility beyond European borders, with countries in the South. Leuven University College anticipated this trend towards higher mobility as well as the demand for better prepared mobility to the South with the organisation of the’ Advanced Bachelor International Cooperation North South’(ICNS). This Advanced Bachelor programme consists of an intensive twomonth preparation of students and a six-month internship in an organisation in the South. Students receive close follow-up during and after their stay in the South and particular attention is given to establishing long-term, sustainable partnerships in the South. Each year 60 students are enrolled in the programme. Given the increased interest in organised learning mobility to the South, there is a growing need for developing sound knowledge and expertise in order to be able to organize this particular type of learning mobility in a qualitative way, assuring it to be a positive and empowering experience for students and guaranteeing that preconceived learning outcomes are achieved. In this paper, we present the Advanced Bachelor ICNS as ‘good practice’. Advanced bachelor International Cooperation North South The Advanced Bachelor is a one-year programme of 60 ECTS credits with the focus on a six month work placement in a country in the global South (Sri Lanka, India, Senegal, Cameroon, Benin, Guatemala, and Nicaragua). As such it aspires to offer students a long-term and in-depth South experience based on a clear vision and embedded in an accredited programme. It allows students to better understand the mechanisms of globalisation and to experience its effects on (local) communities in the South. The Advanced Bachelor ICNS aims to: train skilled, critical and socially engaged professionals capable of working in a fast changing world and aiming to facilitate personal well-being and global connectedness for all be profession-oriented and with a strong base in the field of development practice in North and South facilitate personal growth of students contribute to social justice and a more equal, democratic and tolerant world with respect for its ecological limits Related to the objectives above, the following learning outcomes for students are formulated: Develop critical insights in the economic, political and cultural aspects of globalization processes in order to contextualize North-South issues at micro, meso and macro level Develop a basic understanding of project cycle management and apply this understanding within the local work placement context in the South in order to formulate (small) sustainable interventions Contribute to capacity building within different areas (education, health, social work, etc.) by using personal skills and competencies for the empowerment of others Based on a respectful attitude grow into skilful intervention and participatory cooperation with individuals, communities and professionals in a multicultural context. Conduct practice-oriented research in English or in the commonly used language of the work placement: collect, analyze and interpret primary and secondary data (including the international literature) Reflect self-critically on personal growth and be aware of own frames of reference (norms and values) and the kinds of interaction with those of others Make explicit critical aspects of intercultural communication between different individuals, groups and organizations. Manage complex professional contexts by taking into account specific historical and socio-economic realities and cultural differences. Communicate in English and / or in the commonly used language of the work placement, taking into account local aspects of verbal and non-verbal communication Manage risk situations within an unfamiliar and unknown context. As the learning outcomes make clear, for the Advanced Bachelor ICNS, during the work placement, students are not expected to train their professional competences since they are expected to function already as a professional in their field. Students are expected to acquire generic and specific competences beyond their professional competences allowing them to function professionally in any multicultural environment where themes such as migration, intercultural relations, development, diversity and poverty reduction are central elements. Selection of students Students can apply for the programme from the start of the semester preceding the ICNS Advanced Bachelor programme, usually starting from the second week of February. The application procedure includes a motivation letter and a personal interview. Important selection criteria are: having obtained a first bachelor or Master degree, possessing an open and flexible attitude, possessing basic language skills of the country of destination. Students who lack basic language skills, but with strong profiles are encouraged to take summer courses to upgrade their language competence before the start of the programme. Accepted students are then further delegated to the responsible person for the country of destination for more information about the available work placements and for matching student profiles with hosting organisation needs and preferences. Finally, students send their CV and a motivation letter (in the language of the country) to the hosting organisation, who finally decides whether the student is accepted or not.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.025 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".