Information literacy in académic libraries : Assessment of Japanese students' needs for successful assignment completion in two Halifax universities
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Une etude precedente a revele que les etudiants internationaux ont de la difficulte a acceder, evaluer et utiliser l'information. En reponse a la diversite croissante que l'on retrouve sur les campus, les universites d'Amerique du Nord se doivent d'ameliorer les experiences d'apprentissage des etudiants internationaux. A titre d'echantillon de la population d'etudiants internationaux, cette etude examine comment les etudiants japonais accomplissent leurs travaux a deux universites d'Halifax, Nouvelle-Ecosse: l'Universite Dalhousie et l'Universite St. Mary. L'analyse des groupes de discussion a demontre que les etudiants japonais ont eu besoin de soutien linguistique pour accomplir leurs tâches. Les etudiants ont demontre certaines competences informationnelles, cependant une amelioration est souhaitable dans ce domaine. La collaboration a l'echelle universitaire est indispensable afin d'aider les etudiants internationaux dans leurs etudes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.117 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it