MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2520907000 · doi:10.1017/s026646661600030x

KERNEL ESTIMATION WHEN DENSITY MAY NOT EXIST: A CORRIGENDUM

2016· erratum· en· W2520907000 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEconometric Theory · 2016
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Inference
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsKernel density estimationEstimatorKernel (algebra)Variable kernel density estimationApplied mathematicsLimit (mathematics)Multivariate kernel density estimationGaussian functionDensity estimationKernel smootherGaussian processGaussianKernel methodStatisticsMathematical analysisPure mathematicsArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceRadial basis function kernel

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper “Kernel estimation when density may not exist” (Zinde-Walsh, 2008) considered density as a generalized function given by a functional on a space of smooth functions; this made it possible to establish the limit properties of the kernel estimator without assuming the existence of the density function. This note corrects an error in that paper in the derivation of the variance of the kernel estimator. The corrected result is that in the space of generalized functions the parametric rate of convergence of the kernel density estimator to the limit Gaussian process is achievable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.366
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it