MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2520950090 · doi:10.3968/8688

The Evolution of the British Indian Muslims' National Identity

2016· article· en· W2520950090 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jiang Lan, Ya Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCommunication Studies and Media
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNational identityColonialismNationalismProsperityPartition (number theory)IdeologyPolitical scienceFace (sociological concept)Identity (music)Ethnic groupNational UnityPolitical economySociologyGender studiesDevelopment economicsSocial scienceLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

After the partition in 1947, Pakistan had to face social problems resulted from national identity differences and conflict, which threaten the national unity, social stability and prosperity seriously. The origin and development of this problem were not so much due to historical roots as due to an evil fruit of colonialism. Muslims in British India had to confront with different ideological and organizational challenges of colonialism and nationalism in the colonial institutions. How their national identities exactly originated and evolved? And what was their national identities’ influence? This academic paper intends to explore the causes, processes and impacts of the national identity evolution of the British Indian Muslims.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicCommunication Studies and MediaFrench-language works237,207