Phaselet-Based Method for Detecting Electric Faults in $3\phi$ Induction Motor Drives—Part I: Analysis and Development
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the analysis and development of a new method for electric fault detection in induction motor drives. The proposed method is based on extracting the magnitudes and phases of the high-frequency subband (HFSB) contents present in the d - q-axis components of the stator currents (i <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">d</sub> and i <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">q</sub> ) in an induction motor. The desired magnitudes and phases are extracted by processing id and iq using phaselet frames that are realized by a modulated filter bank. This filter bank is designed using six digital high-pass filters, whose coefficients are determined by biorthogonal phaselet basis functions. Extracted HFSB contents provide signature information that can offer accurate and fast detection of faults. The phaselet-based electric fault detection method has been made into a procedure for digital implementation. The performance of the proposed method is evaluated offline for collected stator currents from two different induction motor drives under different operating conditions. Offline test results show accurate, reliable, and fast detection of electric faults, with minor sensitivity to the ratings, loading levels, and type and location of faults.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".