MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2521036756 · doi:10.1002/srin.200506024

Thermodynamics of Cobalt Aluminate Formation in Molten Cobalt

2005· article· en· W2521036756 on OpenAlexaff
Mansour Soltanieh, Alexander McLean

Bibliographic record

Venuesteel research international · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCobaltGibbs free energyDissolutionOxygenAluminateMaterials scienceInorganic chemistryChemistryPartial pressureMetallurgyThermodynamicsPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The oxygen concentration of liquid cobalt in equilibrium with cobalt aluminate and alumina was measured by suction sampling at temperatures in the range of 1783 to 1873 K. Experiments were made with cobalt of high and low initial oxygen content and with the addition of cobalt aluminate. The Gibbs free energy of the formation of cobalt aluminate in equilibrium with cobalt containing dissolved oxygen and alumina is: Co (l) + (1+x) Al2O3 + [O]1 wt% in Co = CoO·(1+x)Al2O3 with ΔG° = ‐(226400 ± 8730) + (93.04 ± 4.74) T [J/mol]. The oxygen partial pressure in equilibrium with the dissolved oxygen in molten cobalt was determined by zirconia stabilized with magnesia oxygen sensors. The Gibbs standard free energy of dissolution of oxygen in molten cobalt in the range of 1783 to 1873 K is: 1/2 O2 = [O]1 wt% in Co with ΔG° = ‐76410 – 2.16 T [J/g·atom].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuesteel research internationalSame topicMetallurgical Processes and ThermodynamicsFrench-language works237,207