MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2521209685 · doi:10.1093/imamat/hxw035

Pricing options in a Markov regime switching model with a random acceleration for the volatility

2016· article· en· W2521209685 on OpenAlexafffund
Robert J. Elliott, Leunglung Chan, Tak Kuen Siu

Bibliographic record

VenueIMA Journal of Applied Mathematics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicStochastic processes and financial applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersAustralian Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsValuation of optionsImplied volatilityLocal volatilityStochastic volatilityMarkov chainMonte Carlo methodMarkov chain Monte CarloCall optionVolatility smileVolatility (finance)MathematicsEconometricsApplied mathematicsMathematical optimizationEconomicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article discusses option pricing in a Markov regime-switching model with a random acceleration for the volatility. A key feature of the model is that the volatility of the underlying risky security is randomly accelerated by a coefficient which is modulated by a continuous-time, finite-state Markov chain. Consequently, the degree of acceleration in volatility depends on the state of an economy represented by the state of the chain. A system of coupled partial differential equations for the prices of a standard European option over different economic states is derived. Using the homotopy analysis method originating from algebraic topology, a pricing formula for a standard European option is derived in the form of an infinite series. In addition, we give convergence conditions and compute implied volatilities using Monte-Carlo simulations. The implied volatilities can capture some important empirical features such as the implied volatility skew and smile for both VIX options and stock index options. We also provide numerical comparisons between call option prices from the first-order approximation of the proposed numerical method to those from the Monte-Carlo simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.780
Threshold uncertainty score0.231

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIMA Journal of Applied MathematicsSame topicStochastic processes and financial applicationsFrench-language works237,207