Vía Crucis de pintura e imágenes de bulto en Nueva España: Reflexiones sobre la complementariedad de una devoción.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este ensayo analiza cinco series de pintura realizadas en Nueva España en el transcurso del siglo XVIII por diferentes pintores y en diversas regiones del virreinato. Todas representan las estaciones del Vía Crucis, conjugando de diversas maneras dos géneros plásticos: la pintura con la escultura. El propósito de este trabajo es estudiar de qué manera los dos géneros artísticos interactúan en las representaciones de los sucesos del Vía Crucis para ofrecer una reflexión sobre cómo la práctica de la devoción se vio afectada por este cambio de medio.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------This essay analyses five series of painting of different painters of the eighteenth century in diverse regions of the viceroyalty of New Spain. They all illustrate the stations of the Way of the Cross, conjugating two artistic expressions: painting and sculpture. The article considers the different modes in which the painted representations interplay with sculpture to offer a reflection on how the practice of the devotion was affected by the change of medium.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".