MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2521367691 · doi:10.54648/eelr2007035

The World Trade Organisation Panel Report on <i>Brazil Tyres</i> – Advanced Waste Management Theory Entering the Organisation?

2007· article· en· W2521367691 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Geert Van Calster

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Energy and Environmental Law Review · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear and radioactivity studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAppealVictoryPanel dataPanel discussionEuropean unionInternational tradeAutonomyPolitical scienceFlat panelEconomyBusinessLawEconomicsPoliticsAdvertising

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary: At first glimpse the appeal by the European Union against the World Trade Organisation’s Panel ruling in the Brazil Tyres case, may appear puzzling. The Panel had found against Brazil re its ban on the import of retreaded tyres (and accompanying measures). The EU have previously appealed their own victory in the Asbestos panel, seeking to correct the “toxic reasoning” which led that Panel to dismiss Canadian allegations against the French (and now EU-wide) ban on chrysotile asbestos fibres. Similarly, the EU’s aim with current appeal is to ensure sound Panel judgments on regulatory autonomy. This contribution reviews the most striking parts of the Panel’s reasoning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.393

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Energy and Environmental Law ReviewSame topicNuclear and radioactivity studiesFrench-language works237,207