MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2521596927 · doi:10.1109/tii.2016.2610951

A Game Theoretic Approach to Real-Time Robust Distributed Generation Dispatch

2016· article· en· W2521596927 on OpenAlexafffund
Pirathayini Srikantha, Deepa Kundur

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Energy Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsScalabilityComputer scienceDistributed generationDistributed computingElectricity generationSmart gridGridPopulationMathematical optimizationEconomic dispatchElectric power systemPower (physics)EngineeringRenewable energyElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Power demands are rising at an exponential pace due to the increasing proliferation of high-energy consuming devices such as plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. It is well known that scaling traditional power generation systems to accommodate these soaring demands will be excessively costly and may lead to negative environmental ramifications. One approach to supplement increasing energy needs involves diversifying the generation mix to incorporate a large number of local distributed generators (DGs) for economical and sustainable operation. However, such an approach remains an open challenge due to the inherent generation variability of DGs. In this paper, we propose a distributed generation dispatch strategy that can effectively coordinate a large number of DGs to meet consumer demand in real time. Through theoretical analysis based on population games and simulation studies, we demonstrate that our dispatch strategy is scalable and allows for the seamless integration of alternative energy resources into the grid in a robust and an optimally cost-effective manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score0.833

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industrial InformaticsSame topicSmart Grid Energy ManagementFrench-language works237,207